Kimball vs. Inmon: You Want the Truth?! |
||||||||||
|
|
Home > Articles > Kimball vs. Inmon: You Want the Truth?! February 17, 2000 Ralph Kimball and Bill Inmon have long fought over the title of Father of Data Warehousing. For Kimball, it is a title that has been bestowed upon him by his peers, but some say Inmon's title is self-appointed. Regardless, both men have brought a great deal to the world of data warehousing, establishing the structure and frameworks that we still use today. When building a data warehouse, people will either say we took the "Kimbalistic approach" or we took the "Inmonistic approach." Right here, right nowwe will define, once and for all, what is meant by each approach. The Kimball approach is an iterative approach where the data warehouse is built one piece at a time. Kimball identifies common (shared) dimensions within the data warehouse (i.e. customer, time, geography) that will be used across multiple fact groups (i.e. purchase history, billing history) at a high level. He then suggests that we should build this data warehouse one fact group at a time. Kimball calls each of these a "data mart." By developing all of the data marts and populating the shared dimensions, the data warehouse is built. Kimball's approach is definitely a bottom-approach where the warehouse is built piece by piece with a higher level framework in mind. Please login/register to read the entire article.
sponsored announcements and special offers
You can do this!
Earn your master's degree in project management without putting your life on hold at GoUWP.com! Apply today at GoUWP.com for 100% online courses, 45 PDUs each. No entrance exam. University of Wisconsin- Platteville’s MS in Project Management is globally accredited by PMI. Combine academics and real-world scenarios for a 360-degree education. If you have a distributed team, what are you trying to achieve with Agile approaches? Isn't Agile more for co-located teams? There are eight key benefits to working in a distributed Agile environment. A new report from ProjectsAtWork looks at each of those benefits – and how you can achieve them.
Most business and IT executives agree that any company able to rapidly deliver software of high and predictable quality with minimum budgets enjoys a significant advantage. However, practical experience shows that the challenges associated with software quality remain largely unsolved. Download the white paper Uplift Quality with Requirements Driven Testing to learn fundamental principles of Requirements Driven Testing.
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||||