Preconfigured SaaS MS Project PPM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Home > gantthead blogs >
Preconfigured SaaS MS Project PPM Situation: You're in a MS shop, looking at PPM SaaS options.
Q. Is the future of PM and PPM software in house or in the cloud? Obviously everything has been moving in the cloud for a while now. Is that where it all ends up? If so, when? Most of PPM will end up in the cloud, and relatively soon. Even large businesses with well-established IT departments while leveraging their existing infrastructure for some on premise applications will opt to tie into the cloud and get the benefit of both. Organizations handling financial, medical, or intelligence information may opt for a “private cloud”. We’ve found the more agile small and mid-sized companies are moving towards SaaS solutions at a faster rate as evidenced by the success of the early PPM SaaS vendors. Where does sit end up? With more vendors looking ahead to more open and cross platform technology standards like HTML 5, companies will be able to “turn on and off” and only pay for the features they need on demand. So whether on the PC, the Web or a Mobile device they will only pay for the capability they need throughout the lifecycle of a project. Project ramp up may require more of the initial feature set but as a project goes live they will just need more of the update and collaboration capability. Users will also have a choice to select best of breed features from multiple vendors all seamless to the end user. As businesses realize the security, accessibility, as well as the ability to rapidly get access to the latest features and capabilities only as they need them, the benefit of cloud solutions and the economics are irresistible.
Q. Fast implementation times are a key selling point for SaaS PM and PPM offerings competing against Project Server. The idea is that they give you "just enough" of what you need, without extensive customization. Generally speaking, what is the functionality or type/level of customization that you can't get with Project Server in the cloud (whether it's with your company or another) and why? I agree that fast implementation has been one of the SaaS vendor’s value proposition’s when positioning against Microsoft. Microsoft Project and Project Server are tremendously successful with over 20 million Project Users and 10,000 larger companies using Project Server. It still is one of Microsoft Top 10 products so the investment in new development is huge. Although Project Server has been available in a hosted environment for years, there has not been a “pre-packaged or ready-to-go” version that did not require at least some initial configuration. When developing SharkPro Projects we decided to leverage the power and popularity of Project and Project Server 2010 as a platform but provide a completely new way to deploy and experience Project Server. Available via SaaS in minutes or installed on premise in a few hours It is pre-provisioned and has a fresh web interface so users are ready to go, just like the early SaaS products. The difference is SharkPro Projects still has all of the new Microsoft Project 2010 and Server capability available as needed. A company can grow into the more advanced features without having to migrate to another tool later. The limitations we have seen so far have to do more with architecture deployment decisions rather than features. For example, a large employment agency was looking at SaaS initially but also wanted the option to bring on premise to leverage existing infrastructure when ready. Typically not an out-of-the-box solution with SaaS only vendors and requires more thought and planning to deploy. For global companies there are more laws and regulations related to where the actual data resides. Some have compliance requirements that require that servers and data are physically located in the host country.
Q. Do you see many IT shops strictly using MS Project Desktop at this point? Are there specific industries or company sizes that are more likely to be using stand-alone software? We still see a tremendous amount of MS Project Desktop. Many still use Project Desktop even when they have selected other SaaS or higher end tools. Desktop is still great for just learning project management or if you are a project manager managing a large capital construction project and there is not a need to share that information on the web. We also see Project terrific for off-line work when you may not always be connected to the cloud and are on a plane or very remote region in the world such as an offshore platform.
Q. At what point do you see an enterprise needing an EPM solution? Is there a particular set of attributes or pain points that you typically see in companies at that stage of maturity? Is there a particular situation in which a Microsoft-based solution is best? Individual project managers are usually successful running their projects using a tool Like Microsoft Project. Companies often realize they have a problem when they start trying to optimize resources across multiple projects or need to understand and optimize the “demand” of all the requests coming in. Companies also need to be able to support multiple workflows and work streams and need to better communicate and collaborate across teams. I have always felt that the tools did not take into account the likely user scenario or “workflow “and how people interact on a project. Most tools do fine as a big repository of all the project data but forget to take into account the likely “use case” scenarios of how the information needs to flow within a team or organization. That’s a good time to use Microsoft Project Server either from scratch or to start with SharkPro Projects.
Q. Without saying "all of them", what company sizes and industries is your software MOST useful in? Why is that? SharkPro Projects is ideal for the upper mid market. Companies, government agencies or departments within each that have between 250-1500 employees. They typically would like a “ready to go” solution they can start with due to budget constraints and in house expertise but would like to make sure they have the flexibility to grow with the tool and be able to still do some configuration to their specific needs. We have seen 3 types of early customers. Those that started with the early SaaS or SharePoint tools but have started to outgrow them, companies that want to upgrade from earlier versions of MS Project but would like a “ready to go” Project Server to get them started and lastly companies that started with a higher end tool that may be too complex for a specific department to tie into.
| Posted: October 09, 2010 07:59 AM |
Permalink |
Email Notifications: ON |
Julie Goff says:
I have used a SaaS PPM tool. It was very good, however still fell below MS Project when it came to scheduling, especially for setting up the schedule. The ease of cut and paste and drag and drop in a table format was missing.
J.McConnel says:
I think that SaaS is much more preferable in most cases nowadays. MS Project is just not flexible enough to to give your team enough agility. We chose Wrike as our PM and collaboration solution and it meets our needs perfectly! Monday, October 18, 2010 5:21:19 AM EDT
juan vigo says:
In my opinion the cloud solution is more necessary in complex enviroment, and with different locations.
Bradley Norton says:
I am currently evaluating a SaaS option for project management. Our organization has a challenge with teams who do not want to execute the discipline of agreeing with the project scope, let alone be able to use project management tools. We had a failed use of EPM under Microsoft Project that went under because team members didn't want to admit that they didn't understand Project, or want to use online tools. Monday, November 22, 2010 8:55:31 AM EST
Mitch Krayton says:
@ Bradley As part of your discussion, be certain to discuss the impact of doing nothing, or worse, departments working at odds with one another. Those consequences have a cost that must be part of the discussion. Get buy in to that, then change can take place and they can focus together. Without that, you have not earned the right to consider a PM option. Buy-in first, then you can have parties work together on a common outcome. Monday, November 22, 2010 1:37:04 PM ESTPlease Login/Register to leave a comment.
sponsored announcements and special offers
Earn your MBA in Project Management 100% Online with US-News ranked Florida Tech. PMI® GAC Accredited. No GMAT / GRE required. Earn the same prestigious diploma as main-campus students 100% online. Classes start every 8 weeks. Enroll Now!
Adobe Acrobat is sponsoring the search for the World's Smartest Project Manager. See what our documentary crew has dug up so far in their video interviews. Review additional clues for yourself.
Then see what others are saying and report your own sighting. Learn why trusted people are more likely to get the best projects and bigger budgets, get hired or promoted, and are the last to be laid off. Join this live webinar March 1st as Stephen M. R. Covey, author of Smart Trust, shares the 5 actions successful leaders and enterprises are taking to prosper, in the same circumstances causing so many others to fail.
In an age of tight budgets and global competition, businesses need IT to do more than complete on time, on budget and with the required functionality. Learn Why Spreadsheets No Longer Cut it for Strategic PMOs.
Gartner Business Process Management Summit
April 25-27 in Baltimore, MD is for business & IT executives committed to improving business processes & driving high-performance results. Addressing each phase of BPM maturity, the 2012 agenda delivers on today's hottest topics; organizational politics, impact of mobile & cloud, gamification & more.
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||