Trends in PPM Tool Selection and Implementation


Home  >  gantthead blogs  > 
about this blog RSS

recent posts
   Iran, Twitter, and Project Management
   Where is Project Management Certification Taking the Profession?
   Is a Hybrid (Desktop AND SaaS) Approach Best?
   Project Management is All About...
   Listen Up!

Project Management 2.0

  by - Dave Garrett

New technologies, concepts, and Web 2.0 tools are popping up everywhere. How can you use them to help your project team collaborate, communicate - or just give your project an extra boost? [Contact Dave]

View Dave Garrett's profile on LinkedIn Add to Technorati Favorites Add to NetvibesGet this widget from Widgetbox

Advice | Certification | Collaboration Tools | Decision Making | Estimating | Interviews | Learning | Management Approaches | Personal Productivity | PM Software | PPM Software | Presentation Tools | Reporting Tools | Requirements | Research | Risk | Scheduling Software | Security | Team Building | Techie Tools | Time Killers | Time Tracking Software | Training | Virtual Team Tools | Web-based Tools


Trends in PPM Tool Selection and Implementation

Situation: You are thinking about how PPM fits at your org...

I recently spoke with Demian Entrekin, CTO of Innotas about the trends his organization is seeing in the marketplace.  Although every tool vendor obviously has an angle to sell, Demian isn’t your typical product pusher.  Together we worked through what's going on now (at a high level) as more companies take on serious PPM efforts.  Hopefully this will be helpful if you're in one of those companies where PPM is a promising new approach or you're giving it a second try after a lackluster first effort. 

SaaS vs In-house Implementations
A key choice up front in the selection process is whether your organization is biased toward SaaS or in-house solution.  Take a look at each of the drivers listed and see which way our company inherently leans.  Some say that people don't change.  The same sometimes holds true for companies.  So this table could give you a real view into the future.  Based on our conversation, here are some key drivers.


Driver SaaS In-House
Budget Primary Issue Not a huge constraint
Existing PM and PPM Software Not an investment worth preserving An investment in in-house tools that must be preserved
Existing Skills More in processes, less in existing tools used Large numbers of staff well trained in existing traditional tools
Security Issues Merely desire assurance of security All data must be held in-house
Outsourcing Bent Committed to outsourcing non-core activities or open to it. A we “build what we need” mentality
Need for Speed Need something in place now We can wait
Approach to selection Want to try on a small scale that is easy to roll back from before we do a full roll out We want to be very sure before we commit
Customization We want the standard setup We want extreme customization


This is, of course, just a high-level review of selection criteria.  Hopefully enough to “get smart” quickly as you begin your search.  If you want a more detailed look at selection criteria, take a look at the selection tool published on Projects@Work.


Who Feels Your Pain?
Demian tells me they see three basic problems (pain points) when they approach a new customer.  They try to focus on ONE at a time.  If you think about the pain points in the chart below, it’s very much a question of maturity.  It's likely that the success of your first efforts will depend not on having project prioritized right away, but on achieving that next level of maturity.

So as you look at tools, think about the maturity of your organization and how well each candidate tool will support your efforts in that next critical area.  This applies not just to the tool itself, but to the services and best practices that come with it.  Many of these efforts are half tool and half process.  As you narrow your search, map out how you will tackle each pain point and think about which has the greatest chances for success.


Pain Point The Situation The Goal
Supply/Demand Management IT is in a defensive position and “can’t say no”.  Management satisfaction is low because the decision is taken out of their hands. Regulate Demand and make good short-term judgment calls.
Execution Everyone reinvents the wheel with every project and reporting is inconsistent. Repeatable processes and reporting make management easier.
Prioritization
Decisions are made for political reasons or based on very little information. A solid decision-making process.

| Posted: July 18, 2008 03:21 PM | Permalink |


Please Login/Register to leave a comment.



sponsored announcements and special offers
Difficult for competitors to equal. EMA reviews IBM Rational's new quality & requirements management offerings. The verdict, "For companies seeking to improve ROI delivered by software projects,we believe Rational's value proposition is difficult to match."

Microsoft Project Conference 2000
Exclusively disclosing the powerful capabilities included in Microsoft Project 2010 and Microsoft Enterprise Project Management (EPM) Solutions while providing real world guidance on how Microsoft Project 2007 and Microsoft EPM Solutions are helping customers today with project and portfolio management to save money, enhance efficiency and prepare for future growth. Register Today!

Use WorkLenz PPM to Manage Agile Software Development
We invite you to download Métier’s latest white paper, Agile Software Development with WorkLenz, to learn how you can use WorkLenz to manage agile within your organization.



No matter how much cats fight, there always seem to be plenty of kittens.
- Abraham Lincoln