       |
||||||||||
Questioning the "Cost of Sound" |
||||||||||
|
Home > gantthead blogs >
Questioning the "Cost of Sound" I was listening to an interview on the radio today with one of the authors of a book called Healing at the Speed of Sound. The interview was intriguing enough that I’ve already started reading it, but what stuck with me the most from the interview was a question that was asked about the “cost of sound”. The idea being that any kind of noise around you, ambient noise from an air conditioner, the hum of electricity, water running though a pipe in the wall, children in another room or co-workers in a nearby cube, all have a cost associated with them. Since we can’t actually shut our ears, the way we can our eyes, we are always in listening mode. Even if you wear earplugs or noise cancelling headphones, you are merely swapping one noise for another. Noise is something we can’t entirely block out; our brain will always be processing the sounds around us. The reason that the “cost of sound” question stuck with me so much is because I started thinking about different work environments, how different types of people need different soundscapes to maintain productivity and yet, beyond making sure no one is disruptively loud, we pay little to no attention to sound when we put people together in a workspace. So, what I’m wondering is, does anyone measure the impact of sound on productivity in an office setting. And, if anyone does, is there a way to translate the negative or positive actual cost (currency) impact of one sound scape over another on a given project? Can changes in sound scape be translated into cost or risk? And, is sound like other environmental conditions? If the Hawthorne Works studies indicate that simply changing a variable in a work situation will result in increased productivity simply because of change, does this apply to sound? If I start playing Never Mind the Bollocks in the office, will folks be motivated to work more efficiently or quicker? Once their productivity has stabilized, if I replace the Sex Pistols with Kenny G, are they still going to see an improvement?
| Posted: January 03, 2012 01:13 AM |
Permalink |
Email Notifications: ON |
Dave Garrett says:
I heard that interview on NPR yesterday and found it pretty interesting. A lot of it was focused on the music you listen to while you work and the impact it has on your productivity and level of distraction. The author was saying that you should adjust the music to make it work for you, which I thought was interesting. Moving from "what you enjoy" to "what's good for you" sort of sounds like "eat your vegetables" to me - but harder. I can't even make that mental connection between what I eat and what makes me feel healthier. Making the connection between what I listen to and what makes me more productive might be even tougher. That instant gratification thing keeps getting in the way... Tuesday, January 3, 2012 10:59:15 AM EST
Dave Garrett says:
Here's a somewhat related TED talk - AJ Jacobs: How healthy living nearly killed me. Tuesday, January 3, 2012 11:03:51 AM EST
Dave Garrett says:
Right around 5:45, he talks about noise pollution, etc. (right after the part about wearing a helmet when walking) Tuesday, January 3, 2012 11:08:44 AM EST
Dave Prior says:
Thanks Dave - that TED talk was great. I'll post a follow up after I get through the book and the WHO report on noise pollution. Wednesday, January 4, 2012 12:47:19 PM ESTPlease Login/Register to leave a comment.
sponsored announcements and special offers
You can do this!
Earn your master's degree in project management without putting your life on hold at GoUWP.com! Apply today at GoUWP.com for 100% online courses, 45 PDUs each. No entrance exam. University of Wisconsin- Platteville’s MS in Project Management is globally accredited by PMI. Combine academics and real-world scenarios for a 360-degree education. If you have a distributed team, what are you trying to achieve with Agile approaches? Isn't Agile more for co-located teams? There are eight key benefits to working in a distributed Agile environment. A new report from ProjectsAtWork looks at each of those benefits – and how you can achieve them.
Most business and IT executives agree that any company able to rapidly deliver software of high and predictable quality with minimum budgets enjoys a significant advantage. However, practical experience shows that the challenges associated with software quality remain largely unsolved. Download the white paper Uplift Quality with Requirements Driven Testing to learn fundamental principles of Requirements Driven Testing.
|
 sponsors
vendor offers
vendor events
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
