Outlook for Crisis Project Management 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Home > Articles >
Crisis management has become an important niche specialty. But the demand for crisis or emergency managers is greater now because there are more crises to contend with. A crisis is defined by the United Nations as either complex or natural, explains Lew Gedansky,vice president, governance and executive programs atthe Project Management Institute in Philadelphia.
However an emergency or crisis is defined, crisis PMs rely on the same skill sets used by all PMs because they’re dealing with the same kind of stakeholder ecosystem, adds Gedansky. “There are many different types of people that have to be dealt with, each of whom plays a part or has a stake in the crisis. There may be indigenous people, local government, rebel groups and relief and donor organizations (nonprofit foundations). It translates to an enormous stakeholder group that has to be managed and communicated with.”
Crisis management also requires program management skills--the ability to manage resources across multiple projects, says Gedansky.
Strong demand for crisis managers in 2010
Aside from the projected increase in disasters, retiring crisis managers will also create many new jobs, Gedansky. That, combined with the dearth of generalist PMs,spells incredible career opportunities for crisis/disaster managers. Where are the jobs? You name it. Virtually all industry sectors will be hiring crisis managers. The federal government--especially strategic agencies like the Department of Defense, the State Department, the CIA and theFBI--will also all hire crisis managers. Then there are massive industrial projects that will need crisis PMs. “The decommissioning of a nuclear power plant over a 20-year period is a good example of a complex project requiring intense and careful planning,” Gedansky says. Massive infrastructure projects are planned for 2010 and beyond. Repairing our massive interstate highway system will be a top-priority project that will last several years. There are similar reconstruction projects taking place throughout the United States, all of which require complex crisis scenarios. Dealing with the threats facing any major long-term national project is a massive undertaking requiring PMs from many disciplines. Creating an effective disaster plan is only one component of these multilevel projects involving stakeholders from both government and industry.
From Gedansky’s vantage point, project management is far more complicated today than it was in the past. It’s largely because there are more variables to contend with. Working with diverse groups of stakeholders with different vested interests poses communication and collaboration issues, and implementation of projects is a lot more difficult than it was a decade ago.
Even though more colleges and universities are offering courses and degree programs in project management and the PMI is continually creating higher standards for certification--indicating proficiency in advanced PM procedures, protocols and disciplines--Gedansky says most PMs are what he calls “accidental project managers”.
But it won’t be long before all PMs will be academically trained. Over time, this profession will follow the route of all other professions, where potential PMs will go straight from secondary school into college and will graduate with project management degrees. A masterer's or a Ph.D. in project management will carry a lot of clout with organizations and government,” says Gedansky.
The proverbial bottom line is that project management is changing. Neither real-world experience alone nor a degree in project management will be enough to land a decent job. Employers will expect candidates to have both. The magic combination of experience and a degree in project management will define competence.
Look for Part 2 and learn about another view of crisis management, plus conflicting views on the origin of the discipline.
Related Content
"It is interesting to see finally a convergence of skills.
In my past experience, whenever I was called to help steer a crisis, two characteristics were involved:
1. lack of budget- from late 1990s on, I was often in multiple projects at the same time, as I was called to take over a budget (after initiation) or a project/relationship, and therefore the allocation was far below the need; 2d/wk was the usual
2. often, I was called as a "facilitator", to avoid using the name "programme manager" or "project manager"- while instead the activities that I was doing were, well, the classical project management activities (starting with identifying and negotiating the real scope)
3. also, with the release of PRINCE2 2009, I saw an explicit link with MSP (the programme management counterpart), where the "soft" skills (communication, negotiation, etc) are finally given their proper visibility; in the past, in most projects/relationships I was called to manager or recover, I was spending most of my time doing just those activities, and the usual visual paraphernalia of project management (Microsoft Project, Excel budgeting, ISO900X documentation tracking and audit trail, etc) was, frankly, smoke and mirrors to have the customers accept what could not be written on the contract (I had less than ten times contracts explicitly calling for a "negotiator" role)
4. I still have an issue with PM certification- too many junior PM that certify before they build experience have a "forma mentis" focused on the formal and the visual paraphernalia; I remember long ago listening to a podcast, on one of the certifications, stating explicitly that, while the PM job is 90% communication, that could not be measured, and therefore the certification exam focused on the formal 10%
5. last but not least: in crisis management, more than once I was on the second round of crisis management; why? because some negotiator/facilitators/crisis managers focus on the "closing", as it would be called in sales, i.e. declaring the crisis done, shaking hands, exchanging monies and so on; but really few focus on the long-term sustainability of the solution
let's hope that there will not be yet another "formal certification"
R"
sponsored announcements and special offers
CA Technologies' Innovation Management survey is a study into the barriers to innovation success and the measures companies are taking to improve performance. Each survey respondent will receive a complimentary copy of the report containing the survey's results. Please participate now!
Build and deploy interactive reports and dashboards — without any hidden costs. Our in-the-cloud free trial lets you see for yourself — no download required. SAP Crystal Reports Server 60-day Free Trial
Enable Agile Process; Support Agile Teams Enterprise hardware and software evolve faster than your customers can consume new versions and features. Overcome this gap: learn how professional services can boost product consumption and speed repurchasing in TSIA/Compuware white paper. Read now Packaged Services Success: Join us on Sept 8 for this Free Webinar as RTM Consulting and Tenrox discuss the competitive and financial benefits of Leveraging Automation to meet the Rising Demand for Productized Professional Services. EARN 1 PDU. Register Here Today to receive a Free White Paper.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||